Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 2753 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4130 - 202 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
