Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 618 days older than Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105T - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |