Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 245 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 88% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £0.58 vs £5.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10105F - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
97.05882352941177%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.04/FPS
11.507936507936508%
Price, £
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
86.75417661097852%
Multi-Core
4472
36.20173237270299%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |