Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 879 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £84.99 vs £408.88
- Up to 79% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9900K - £0.31 vs £1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10105 - 280 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
277
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
280
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
21%
Price, £
£408.88
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £408.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |