Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £84.99 vs £199.32
- Up to 54% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-14400F - £0.16 vs £0.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-10105 - 567 vs 536 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
536
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
567
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
45%
Price, £
£199.32
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for £199.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |