Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 245 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £79.99 vs £2378.05
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10105 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 64 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£2378.05
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1487
89.8489425981873%
Multi-Core
4609
31.613965292544073%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |