Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 1200 - 59 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - £86.83 vs £175.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 1200 - £1.47 vs £3.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£86.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £86.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4888 minutes ago
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |