Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-3570S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3504 days newer than Core i5-3570S.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570S - 135 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i5-3570S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
