Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4013 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2400 - 726 vs 677 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
554
34.56019962570181%
Multi-Core
1607
59.60682492581603%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
