Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 614 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10320 - 391 vs 383 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
