Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 539 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
150
98.68421052631578%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£835.82
100%
Buy for £835.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
95.64439140811456%
Multi-Core
2696
21.824657977819154%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |