Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3360 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 204 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
