Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1677 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G550 - 322 vs 315 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
322
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |