Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2586 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 21% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G540 - 199 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |