Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3229 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G540 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 24 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
22.903412377096586%
Multi-Core
679
6.769690927218345%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |