Key Differences
In short — Celeron G540 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G540 is 603 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 6 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
81.14754098360656%
Multi-Core
679
43.637532133676096%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |