Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3350 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G530 - 217 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 3483 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£197
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |