Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1352 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3250 - 120 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
