Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1737 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
