Buy on Amazon
£59.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 276 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 91% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - £5.56 vs £59.75
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
69.15584415584416%
Multi-Core
739
70.31398667935301%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
