Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1757 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 463 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |