Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-4300 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |