Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 1220 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3420 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930T - 253 vs 248 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
