Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 20% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930T - 132 vs 110 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
34.18590143480973%
Multi-Core
948
35.16320474777448%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
