Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1948 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G540 - 155 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
