Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 490 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
94.32013769363166%
Multi-Core
948
95.56451612903226%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
