Buy on Amazon
£470
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G3930T - 187 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
AMD Ryzen™ 9 3900XT Processor (12C/24T, 70MB Cache, Up to 4.7 GHz Max Boost) – Without Cooler
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
31.694621168305382%
Multi-Core
948
9.451645064805584%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
