Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 2391 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 217% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930T - 326 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
326
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £195.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
19.97084548104956%
Multi-Core
948
7.521421770866392%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |