Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 1470 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800 - £49.99 vs £239.55
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3930 - 311 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75108 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 XT Processor, 8 Cores/16 Threads Unlocked, Zen 3 Architecture, 36MB L3 Cache, 105W TDP, Up to 4.8 GHz Frequency Boost, Socket AM4, DDR4 and PCIe 4.0, Wraith Prism Cooler
Buy for £239.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 5800
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
