Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 405 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 195 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |