Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1094 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium G645T - 276 vs 271 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
61.10154905335629%
Multi-Core
606
61.08870967741935%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
