Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 1696 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 101 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-2600
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
94.93464052287581%
Multi-Core
992
48.296007789678676%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
