Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 61 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 32% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3900 - 102 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.29522952295229%
Multi-Core
992
32.81508435329143%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
