Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 730 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G3900 - 138 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
58.391959798994975%
Multi-Core
992
50.61224489795918%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
