Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3900 vs Core i3-3220

Celeron G3900 vs Core i3-3220: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than Core i3-3220.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 112 vs 111 FPS
  • Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

112

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


FPS

111

99.10714285714286%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£16.26

100%

Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155

Buy for £16.26 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74839 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

91.42857142857143%

Intel Core i3-3220 Logo
Core i3-3220

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

525

90.36144578313254%

Multi-Core

1085

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

vs
Intel Core i3-3220 Logo

Intel Core i3-3220

Sep 1st, 2015
Release DateSep 3rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionCore i3
SkylakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
2Threads
4
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.3 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
51 W
TDP55 W
14 nm
Process Size22 nm
28.0xMultiplier
33.0x
Intel HD 510Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 2500
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.