Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930T - 159 vs 158 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |