Buy on Amazon
£19.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1778 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £19.99 vs £1179.39
- Up to 98% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - £0.11 vs £6.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than Celeron G3900 - 185 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
177
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15660 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.38/FPS
1%
Price, £
£1179.39
1%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, up to 4.3 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £1,179.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
