Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 108% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1840 - 314 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 53 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
