Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3071 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1840 - 249 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-13700KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
17.492206442674053%
Multi-Core
854
4.850619107122571%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
