Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 978 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £49.95 vs £171.54
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - £0.43 vs £1.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19494 minutes ago
Buy for £171.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |