Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2320 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2320 is 970 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-2320 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1840 - 609 vs 606 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - £23.2 vs £49.95
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Celeron G1840 - £0.04 vs £0.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
606
99.50738916256158%
Value, £/FPS
£0.08/FPS
50%
Price, £
£49.95
46%
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3713 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
609
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£23.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £23.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
94.21641791044776%
Multi-Core
854
55.382619974059665%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-2320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |