Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3071 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1840 - 190 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
18.383691299599565%
Multi-Core
854
5.540058384690237%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
