Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 605 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1840 - 224 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - £11.99 vs £49.95
- Up to 77% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1840 - £0.05 vs £0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£11.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £11.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |