Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1076 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1840 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
53.213909378292946%
Multi-Core
854
27.566171723692705%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |