Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2342 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1820 - 207 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.90383365821962%
Multi-Core
825
17.833981841763944%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |