Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 2599 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 212 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
23.92787524366472%
Multi-Core
825
8.362899138367967%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |