Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2185 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1820 - 367 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.81455399061033%
Multi-Core
825
7.713163799551234%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |