Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2044 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 6% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1820 - 207 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
195
94.20289855072464%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.81455399061033%
Multi-Core
825
11.423428413181943%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |