Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 1061 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Pentium G6950 - 254 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
