Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 546 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1620 - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
